The Wired Connection faster Tour Leads only

Automation team · internal

Automation Detail

Operational health of the automation estate — what each workflow does, who owns it, its security posture, and what needs attention. Both platforms are wired in: n8n and Tray. Findings have been adversarially re-verified; each shows its verdict.

How it all connects

Three dashboards, one flow. Hover to trace a path; click any box to see how it works inside.

contract PDFs extract + BAA AI review usage + cost inventory + Prowler live scan BAA status shared audit data Google Drive Contract PDFs Anthropic Claude Haiku + Sonnet AWS Org accounts + resources n8n + Tray Live automations Contract Renewals Supplier contracts + BAA registry S3 state + DynamoDB YOU ARE HERE Automation Inventory n8n + Tray workflows, scored + Infrastructure — AWS + Prowler audit dataset (S3) YOU ARE HERE Token Governance Every Claude key: usage, cost, rotation DynamoDB YOU ARE HERE One pane of glass unified, cross-linked view •  Contracts •  Automation •  Token Governance linked, not copied
data in shared between dashboards unified view
n8n · live (197 workflows) Tray · live (82 workflows) Zapier · pending key
How we arrived at the security score

Every workflow starts at 100. We subtract points for each issue found: High 28, Medium 14, Low 5, Hygiene 3. The total is floored at 0.

85 and up is Good, 70 to 84 is Fair, 50 to 69 is Watch, under 50 is Risk. A workflow that has not been deep-scanned shows “Not scanned” instead of a score, so an unreviewed workflow never looks like a clean 100.

Open any workflow to see its exact deductions, the workflow config each finding cites, and the standard (OWASP, CWE, HIPAA) the risk maps to.

WorkflowPlatformOwner StatusPHISecuritySign-offSize

← back to all tools